Top 10 Entry▲ 0.2 vs 2025
70.9
projected 2026 cut-off score
Live · 2026 projection
Where India's institutes are projected to stand in 2026
A band-wise projection of the NIRF 2026 rankings across four disciplines, built on seven years of official scores. We report the tier an institute is heading for, the marks it takes to get there, and how firm each call is — not a false-precision rank.
100 institutes ranked
7 years of data
Bands, not exact ranks
India-wide coverage
Data-driven insights
Evidence-based forecasting
Forecast snapshot
Marks to make the cut in 2026
The projected overall score an institute needs to break into each tier next year — read left to right, from the entry line into the top 100 up to the elite top 10.
i
These are AI-powered projections based on 7 years of official NIRF scores and historical trends.
Scores are on a 100-point scale.
The 2026 board
The 2026 Tier Snapshot
Explore the complete forecast field by tier. Numbers indicate the institution's sequence on this forecast board; the model itself remains band-based rather than claiming an exact official NIRF rank. Select any institution to open its forecast detail.
● Firm call
● Moderate
● Low — verify
▲ Up a tier
▼ Down
✦ New to the field
The mark is the move since 2025.▲Up a tier▼Down✦New— Stable
Trajectory
How the cut-off has moved — and where 2026 lands
The score it took to reach each tier, year on year, ending in the 2026 projection. Hover any point for the exact mark. The bar to get in keeps rising — competition tightens across the table.
- Top 10
- Top 25
- Top 50
- Top 75
- Top 100
Tier intelligence
The Pillar Profile For Each Tier
Projected 2026 pillar benchmarks by ranking tier, with 2025 holdout error shown in parentheses for validation context.
Tier
Teaching ◆
Research ◆
Outcomes
Inclusivity
Perception
Top 10
86
65
95
74
68
Top 25
80
54
90
71
46
Top 50
77
45
85
72
32
Top 75
75
40
81
71
25
Top 100
72
35
79
69
22
Competitive separation
What separates the tiers — the five pillars
Each chart shows how the projected 2026 benchmark for one NIRF pillar changes across ranking tiers. This makes the competitive gap between the top bands immediately visible.
2026 projected scorecard
How 2026 looks — projected scorecard
Category-level outlook across Teaching, Research, Outcomes, Inclusivity and Perception, compared with the 2025 observed scorecard.
Movers
Who moves up a tier
Institutes projected to climb into a better band next year versus 2025 — the stories worth watching.
i
Movements are based on projected NIRF 2026 scores. Actual rankings may vary.
Geography
Where the top field is concentrated
A state-level view of representation inside the projected 2026 field.
Complete source dataset
How firm is this — and what it can't see.
Nothing from the attached forecast dataset is omitted here. This section exposes category counts, every cut-off validation point, tier-level pillar profiles, low-confidence calls, soft pillars and the locked model rule.
Watch-list — low-confidence placements
Xavier Institute of Management (XIMB)
last basis
Amity University Haryana, Gurgaon
3yr stale
Vellore Institute of Technology
6yr stale
What the model is blind to
3 new-entrant slots. A few first-time institutes with no track record enter each year — those slots are flagged as reserve, not predicted.
The top of the table drifts up faster than a steady trend follows, so the Top-10 entry mark reads a little low.
The middle bands turn over most — trust the tier, not a precise position within it.
How to read this & its limits
• Bands, not seats. Ranking is competitive — a correct score can still miss an exact position if the field around it shifts. We publish the tier and the target marks, because the tier is a far more reliable call than the exact seat.
• New institutes can't be foreseen. A school with no ranking history has nothing to project from; each discipline sees a few genuinely new entrants a year. Those slots are flagged as reserve, not predicted.
• Low-confidence rows are marked. Where a projection leans on old or thin data, it is flagged — treat those as watch-items, not firm calls.
• Method: per-pillar recency-weighted damped trend, overall recomposed via NIRF weights (0.30 TLR + 0.30 RP + 0.20 GO + 0.10 OI + 0.10 PR). A projection, not an official result.
